Capability · Curriculum & Assessment

Curriculum & Assessment

Curriculum coverage and assessment quality are hard to see until results arrive — when it is too late to catch up.

Book a Demo

Audience

HODsEducatorsModeratorsCurriculum advisors

Workflow

  1. 01Define curriculum versions, phases & subjects
  2. 02Build term & lesson plans
  3. 03Track coverage against plan
  4. 04Plan & capture assessments
  5. 05Moderate & report
  6. 06Apply promotion/progression rules
Core features

What it covers

Curriculum

  • Curriculum versions, phases & grades
  • Subjects, topics & learning outcomes
  • Term & lesson plans
  • Coverage tracking

Assessment

  • Assessment plans
  • Assignments, tests & examinations
  • Rubrics & mark capture
  • Moderation

Outcomes

  • Reports
  • Academic performance
  • Promotion & progression rules

Intelligence

Coverage gaps and performance patterns per outcome inform support and catch-up plans. Assessment weighting and promotion criteria run as transparent deterministic rules.

Integrations

Designed to align with configurable national and institutional curriculum frameworks.

Workflow example

Illustrative Data

Grade 10 Physical Sciences is three weeks behind the term plan. The HOD sees affected outcomes and classes, agrees a catch-up plan and tracks delivery weekly.

Outcomes

  • Stronger curriculum accountability
  • Targeted catch-up
  • Consistent moderation
Control model

Records become accountable work

Design intentions, not independently verified operational controls.

Ownership & permissions
Assigned HODs, Educators, Moderators, Curriculum advisors work only within authorised tenant, programme and record scopes.
Rules & approvals
Required evidence, policy versions, delegated authority and independent review gate consequential changes. Missing evidence returns to the owner.
Audit & reporting
Record who changed what, when and why. Measure evidence completeness, queue age, approval turnaround and unresolved exceptions rather than invent performance results.
The golden thread

From allocation to a verified outcome

Illustrative Data

01 / 8 · National 3,000-learner programme

Funder

Accountable owner
Funder
Evidence & records
Illustrative target: 3,000 learners, budget and outcomes
Rule & approval gate
Funding conditions and targets approved
Reporting KPI
Enrolment against 3,000 target; verified completion
Next action
Implementer
Permission boundary
Assigned programme and records only; cross-party sharing requires explicit authorisation.

Review exceptions before progressing

Website demonstration of intended workflows. No real records, approvals, credentials or payments are processed.

Related

Connected capabilities

Programme Lifecycle

Needs analysis and proposal; Funding, budget and implementation plan.

View

Venues, Tools & Equipment

Venue profiles, capacity and accessibility; Equipment availability and safety records.

View

Accreditation & Quality

Provider scope and expiry records; Qualification catalogue and practitioner registration.

View

See Curriculum & Assessment in a demo

Tell us about your schools, district or programme. We’ll show how SkillsCortex could connect your workflows — and agree what a scoped pilot would prove.

Book a Demo Discuss a Pilot